Record the receipt of
Share Application money in Board Meeting.
On the practical front this money is very much available to
the company as nobody can trace this money. Reason being there is no such
requirement to open some escrow account for the same application money.Practically use of this money depends on the terms of subscription agreement between the prospective investor and Issuer Company.
Only if the applicants raises objections, or ask for refunds then the problem starts , otherwise no problem
However as per Schedule VI the Share Application money is to be taken as Current Liablity thus therotically that money is not available to company.
However as per
Section 73 Applicable in case of Public Placement through Stock Exchange
Section 73(3)All moneys received as aforesaid shall be kept in a separate bank account maintained with a Scheduled Bank until the permission has been granted, or where an appeal has been preferred against the refusal to grant such permission, until the disposal of the appeal, and the money standing in such separate account shall, where the permission has not been applied for as aforesaid or has not been granted, be repaid within the time and in the manner specified in subsection (2), and if default is made in complying with this sub-section, the company, and every officer of the company who is in default, shall be punishable with fine, which may extend to five thousand rupees.
Section 73 (3A)
Moneys standing to the credit of the separate bank account referred to in sub-section (3) shall not be utilised for any purpose other than the following purposes, namely :-
(a) adjustment against allotment of shares, where the shares have been permitted to be dealt in on the stock exchanger or each stock exchange specified in the prospectus; or
(b) repayment of moneys received from applicants in pursuance of the prospectus, where shares have not been permitted to be dealt in on the stock exchanger or each stock exchange specified in the prospectus, as the case may be, or, where the company is for any other reason unable to make the allotment of share.
Also to note
A ruling by the Jharkhand High Court assumes importance.
The case involved a company which received share application money from 10
persons in cash for issue of shares. The tax officer levied penalty under
Section 271 D of the Income-Tax Act, stating that receiving share application
money in cash resulted in violation of Section 269 SS of the I-T Act.
Section 269 SS provides that
no person shall accept from any other person any loan or deposit in excess of
Rs 20,000 otherwise than by an account-payee cheque subject to certain
exceptions. Section 271 D provides that if a person accepts any loan or deposit
in contravention of Section 269 SS, he shall be liable to pay penalty of an
amount equivalent to the loan taken or deposit so accepted. The term "deposit" is explained in Section 269 SS to mean loan or deposit of money. Whereas, Section 269 T defines "loan or deposit" in a narrower sense, to mean any deposit of money which is repayable after notice or repayable after a period and in the case of a person other than company includes deposit of any nature. This definition should apply in the case of levy of penalty on repayment of loan or deposit. The company contended that the amount received towards share application money is neither loan nor deposit. In an appeal, the Appellate Commissioner struck down the penalty but in the second appeal the Tribunal upheld it, treating share application money as deposit.
The Jharkhand High Court observed that until the
applications for issue of share are processed and shares are allotted or the
amounts are refunded to the applicants, the amounts are clearly not loans
repayable even without a demand by the lenders. The amounts are liable to be
refunded to applicants once it is decided that shares were not to be allotted
to them.
The court finally held that the share application money
received by the company partakes the character of deposit since it is repayable
in specie on refusal to allot shares and is repayable if recalled by the
applicant before the allotment of shares and the conclusion of the contract.
Consequently, receipt of such money in contravention of Section 269 SS attracts
penalty under Section 271 D of the ITA.
It is mandatory for subscribers to acquire shares as committed by them while signing the MoA of the company.
The share application money is not a deposit as the amount is received for a specific purpose of allotment of shares and is not a money-lending transaction.
Further, the prime obligation of the company is to issue shares and not repay the application money. The amount is repaid only in case where shares are not allotted, which is a consequential event in the process of share allotment.
The tax authorities will rely on this ruling for levying penalty under Section 271 D until a favourable ruling is pronounced. Therefore, private companies need to ensure that share application monies are received by an account-payee cheque only to avoid any penal consequences.
But in the matter of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus
RUGMINI RAM RAGAV SPINNERS P. LTD. [2008 -TMI - 30707 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] the
issue has been decided in favor of assessee.
Provisions of section269SS does not apply to share application money accepted in cash and consequently no penalty under section 271D was leviable. Commissioner of IncomeTax v. I.P. India (P) Ltd. (2012) 43 (I) ITCL 194 (Del-High Court).
Provisions of section269SS does not apply to share application money accepted in cash and consequently no penalty under section 271D was leviable. Commissioner of IncomeTax v. I.P. India (P) Ltd. (2012) 43 (I) ITCL 194 (Del-High Court).
Thank you so much...
ReplyDelete